QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Treasury convenes fintech firms to shape terrorism-finance rules

H.R. 2384 — Financial Technology Protection Act of 2025 · Filed by Zachary (Zach) Nunn (R-IA) · 4 cosponsors · Introduced Mar 26, 2025 · Passed chamber

85%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Interagency Fintech Counterterrorism Task…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill creates a new Independent Financial Technology Working Group—a multi-agency task force led by the Treasury Department—to research how terrorists and criminals use digital assets and blockchain technology to evade sanctions and launder money, and to develop legislative and regulatory proposals to combat these threats. The Working Group will include representatives from Treasury, Justice, FBI, DEA, Homeland Security, State Department, and intelligence agencies, plus private-sector appointees from fintech companies, blockchain intelligence firms, financial institutions, and civil liberties organizations. The group will issue annual reports for four years, then sunset, with a final strategy report due within 180 days on how the U.S. should prevent rogue actors from using digital assets to evade sanctions.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is the establishment of a working group to research and propose policy on terrorist use of digital assets. It is fundamentally a governance and research instrument, not a direct regulatory or appropriations measure.

What the text implies

  • The Working Group's private-sector appointees (fintech, blockchain intelligence, financial institutions) will have direct input into federal counterterrorism and sanctions policy, creating potential for industry influence over regulatory proposals that may affect their business models.
  • The bill mandates public reporting of the strategy to prevent sanctions evasion via digital assets, which may inadvertently disclose U.S. intelligence methods or vulnerabilities in detection systems to adversaries.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

blockchain intelligence companies; financial technology companies; financial institutions

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record