QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence
Full Simple

Nevada land grab: feds hand off 20,000+ acres to counties, tribes, and private bidders

H.R. 2317 — Northern Nevada Economic Development and Conservation Act of 2026 · Filed by Mark Amodei (R-NV) · Introduced Mar 25, 2025 · Passed chamber

65%
Transparency
Typical bill: 85%
25/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
1
Unrelated riders
No connection to the stated subject
Federal Land Transfer and Disposition Act

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill transfers and sells federal lands in northern Nevada to state and local governments, tribal entities, and private bidders. It conveys ~67 acres to Nevada for a state park, ~7,777 acres to Douglas County for public use (with an option to buy back federal reversionary interests), and ~31.5 acres for competitive sale. It also transfers ~2,423 acres of federal land and accepts ~199 acres of private land into trust for the Washoe Tribe, designates ~12,392 acres as the Burbank Canyons Wilderness, and conveys additional parcels to Incline Village, the Truckee River Flood Management Authority, and Carson City for fire protection, flood control, and development. Revenue from land sales is split: 5% to Nevada education, 10% to Douglas County, and 85% to a special account for land acquisition and conservation.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is the conveyance, sale, and trust-transfer of federal lands in northern Nevada to multiple entities (state, county, tribe, local districts) for conservation, recreation, flood control, and economic development. It is a land-management and property-disposition statute, not a regulatory or appropriations measure.

  • Section 403–407 authorize Carson City to acquire federal land for roadway expansion, sell/lease conveyed land to third parties, and dispose of additional parcels. These provisions are geographically and functionally distinct from the Douglas County and Incline Village transfers and appear to address Carson City-specific infrastructure and development needs unrelated to the bill's stated conservation and economic-development purpose in Douglas County.

What the text implies

  • The 85% revenue-sharing mechanism (Section 113(m)) creates a special account available to the Secretary without further appropriation, potentially enabling land acquisition and conservation spending without congressional oversight of individual projects.
  • Conveyances to Douglas County and other local entities include reversion clauses, but enforcement depends on Secretary discretion; if land use drifts from stated purposes, reverting title may be politically difficult or delayed.
  • The bill permits competitive sale of ~31.5 acres of federal land and allows Douglas County to jointly select additional parcels for disposal (Section 113(c)), creating a mechanism for private acquisition of public lands with minimal transparency on buyer identity or end use.
  • Tribal trust-land designation (Section 121) excludes gaming but permits fuel-reduction and landscape-restoration activities in consultation with the tribe; the scope of 'landscape restoration' is undefined and could enable extensive forest management or development.
  • The Burbank Canyons Wilderness designation includes carve-outs for military overflights, existing airstrips, and livestock grazing, and permits motorized-vehicle use for wildlife management, narrowing wilderness protections compared to standard Wilderness Act language.

Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.

Who it affects

Citizens benefit from wilderness designation, tribal land trust expansion, and local recreation/flood-control infrastructure, but face reduced federal oversight of land use, potential privatization of some parcels through competitive sale, and loss of federal conservation standards on conveyed lands. The bill's revenue-sharing mechanism (85% to a special account) may fund conservation, but implementation depends on future appropriations and agency discretion.

Who stands to gain

  • Douglas County, Nevada (receives 10% of land-sale proceeds and conveyance of ~7,777 acres without co
  • State of Nevada (receives 5% of land-sale proceeds and ~67 acres for state park)
  • Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California (receives ~2,423 acres of federal land and ~199 acres of priva
  • Incline Village General Improvement District (receives federal land for fire-risk reduction and recr
  • Truckee River Flood Management Authority (receives federal land for flood control without considerat
  • Carson City, Nevada (receives ~258 acres and opportunity to sell/lease conveyed land)
  • Private bidders in competitive land sales (acquire ~31.5 acres and additional jointly-selected parce

Named in the bill

Douglas County, Nevada, State of Nevada, Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California, Incline Village General Improvement District, Truckee River Flood Management Authority, Carson City, Nevada, U.S. Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, Secretary of Agriculture, Secretary of the Interior, Burbank Canyons Wilderness, Lake Tahoe-Nevada State Park

Where it stands

  • Mar 25, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
  • Mar 25, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Agriculture and House Committee on Natural Resources · Congress.gov: “Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period…”
  • Jul 15, 2026 — Markup held in committee · Congress.gov: “Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held”
  • Jul 15, 2026 — Reported out of committee · Congress.gov: “Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 23 - 12”
  • Sep 14, 2026 — Passed the House · Congress.gov: “On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote”
  • Sep 14, 2026 — Floor vote scheduled · Congress.gov: “Mr. Amodei (NV) moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended”

Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.

Money around this bill

6 lobbying clients named this bill on 11 disclosure filings across 3 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $380,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 6 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.

More lobbying clients named this bill than 82% of bills with at least one filing.

Mark Amodei, the sponsor, reported $174,019 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.

  • State of Nevada — $180,000 on 3 filings
  • Nv Energy — $80,000 on 2 filings
  • Douglas County Nevada — $40,000 on 2 filings
  • Incline Village General Improvement District — $40,000 on 2 filings
  • Truckee River Flood Project — $30,000 on 1 filing

Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.

How this was measured

Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (50,094 characters) on Jul 21, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.

Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.

Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.

As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.

“Nevada land grab: feds hand off 20,000+ acres to counties, tribes, and private bidders” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr2317 Report an error

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record

The week in bills

One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.

One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.