Congress quietly funds ocean monitoring for another five years
H.R. 2294 — To reauthorize the Integrated Coastal and Ocean Observation System Act of 2009. · Filed by Mike Ezell (R-MS) · 25 cosponsors · Introduced Mar 24, 2025 · Passed chamber
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill reauthorizes federal funding and governance for the Integrated Coastal and Ocean Observation System (ICOOS), a network that monitors coastal and ocean conditions. It renames the governing body from 'Council' to 'Committee,' expands the system's mandate to include operational oceanography measurements and ocean weather monitoring, requires regional coordination on data sharing, and appropriates $47.5 million annually through fiscal year 2030.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to extend and strengthen federal funding and governance for coastal and ocean monitoring systems. It is a straightforward reauthorization with modest scope expansions, not a policy innovation or narrow carve-out.
What the text implies
- Renaming 'Council' to 'Committee' may signal a shift in governance structure or interagency coordination model, though the bill does not detail the functional difference.
- Mandate for regional offices and federally funded projects to collaborate with regional coastal observing systems could create new administrative burdens or coordination costs for participating agencies.
- Expansion to include 'operational oceanography measurements' broadens the system's scope beyond traditional coastal observation, potentially increasing data collection and integration complexity.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Citizens gain improved coastal and ocean monitoring infrastructure, which supports public safety (storm preparedness, marine hazard warnings), environmental protection, and climate adaptation. The mandate for regional data sharing increases transparency and coordination across agencies and local systems, benefiting coastal communities and the broader public.
Who stands to gain
- Federal agencies operating ICOOS (NOAA, NSF, etc.)
- Regional coastal observing systems receiving federal coordination and data-sharing support
- Research institutions and contractors supporting oceanographic monitoring
Named in the bill
Integrated Coastal and Ocean Observation System (ICOOS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Science Foundation (NSF), Ocean Policy Committee, Interagency Ocean Observation Committee, Regional coastal observing systems
Where it stands
25 cosponsors: 19 Democrats, 6 Republicans.
- Mar 24, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Mar 24, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology and House Committee on Natural Resources · Congress.gov: “Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Science, Space, and…”
- May 20, 2025 — Hearing held · Congress.gov: “Subcommittee Hearings Held”
- Jul 23, 2025 — Markup held in committee · Congress.gov: “Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held”
- Jul 23, 2025 — Reported out of committee · Congress.gov: “Ordered to be Reported by Unanimous Consent”
- Mar 16, 2026 — Passed the House · Congress.gov: “On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H2513)”
- Mar 16, 2026 — Floor vote scheduled · Congress.gov: “Mr. Wittman moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
1 lobbying clients named this bill on 2 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $40,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 4 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 0% of bills with at least one filing.
Mike Ezell, the sponsor, reported $480,431 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Ioos Association — $40,000 on 2 filings
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 23, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (1,512 characters) on Jul 10, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 23, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress quietly funds ocean monitoring for another five years” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr2294 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.