Ocean Partnerships get funding boost—but lose power to propose regulations
H.R. 10756 — Regional Ocean Partnerships Reauthorization Act · Filed by Mike Ezell (R-MS) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Oct 6, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill reauthorizes the Regional Ocean Partnerships program through fiscal year 2031, extending it five years beyond its current expiration. It modifies the program's scope by clarifying coastal state definitions, adding enforcement authority alongside regulatory functions, adjusting geographic references, and establishing new funding levels ($10.6–$10.9 million annually). Critically, it adds a new prohibition: Regional Ocean Partnerships may not use federal funds to develop regulatory proposals, model regulations, or compliance programs.
Why we flagged it
The bill's primary function is straightforward reauthorization and funding extension. However, the addition of subsection (j)(4)—a prohibition on regulatory development—represents a material constraint on the partnerships' prior scope, buried in a technical amendment section rather than highlighted in the title or summary.
What the text implies
- The prohibition on developing 'regulatory proposals, model regulation, or compliance program' may prevent Regional Ocean Partnerships from proposing science-based ocean conservation measures, shifting regulatory initiative to federal agencies or potentially to industry-led alternatives.
- The shift from 'natural and human-induced' to an unspecified term in subsection (f)(2)(B) is unclear from the text alone; the effect depends on what the amended provision now reads, which is not quoted here.
- Removal of Vermont from a geographic reference in subsection (b)(3)(ii) and substitution of 'America' for 'Mexico' suggest scope adjustments, but the operative context (what these references control) is not visible in the bill text.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Citizens benefit from continued ocean partnership coordination and modest funding increases for coastal management. However, the new prohibition on regulatory development may weaken the partnerships' ability to propose science-based ocean protections, shifting regulatory initiative away from collaborative regional bodies toward federal agencies or industry-led processes.
Named in the bill
Regional Ocean Partnerships, Regional Coastal Partnerships, Regional Great Lakes Partnerships, James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023, Section 10202
Where it stands
1 cosponsor: 1 Democrats.
- Oct 6, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Oct 6, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on Natural Resources · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (1,841 characters) on Oct 16, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Ocean Partnerships get funding boost—but lose power to propose regulations” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr10756 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.