QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

North Dakota swaps school trust lands for federal acreage—tribes get a say.

H.R. 2252 — North Dakota Trust Lands Completion Act of 2025 · Filed by Julie Fedorchak (R-ND) · Introduced Mar 21, 2025 · Passed chamber

75%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Land Exchange / Trust Land Consolidation

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill allows North Dakota to swap state-owned school and university trust lands located on or near Indian reservations for federal public lands elsewhere in the state. North Dakota gives up parcels within reservation boundaries; the federal government conveys unappropriated federal land of roughly equal value to the state. The state benefits by consolidating holdings outside reservations; tribes benefit when relinquished parcels within reservation boundaries are taken into trust for tribal benefit.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is a state-federal land swap designed to resolve title conflicts between North Dakota's trust lands and Indian reservations. It is functionally a land-management and property-rights clarification statute, not a subsidy, deregulation, or commemorative measure.

What the text implies

  • Tribes must affirmatively request that relinquished parcels be taken into trust; passive non-response means the land remains under federal management, not tribal control, reducing de facto tribal land restoration.
  • The 25% equalization-payment cap may incentivize the state to select lower-value federal parcels, potentially leaving the state with less valuable land if federal parcels in desirable locations are scarce.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

North Dakota state trust funds (school and university endowments); Grazing permittees and leaseholders (continuity of permits and potential range improvements); Mineral lessees (if federal mineral leases transfer to state-held land)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record