Congress kills North Dakota land-use plan—but what was in it?
H.J.Res. 105 — Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "North Dakota Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan". · Filed by Julie Fedorchak (R-ND) · Introduced Jul 10, 2025 · Signed
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This is a Congressional Review Act (CRA) disapproval resolution that kills a Bureau of Land Management resource management plan for North Dakota issued in January 2025. Congress is voting to reject the BLM's land-use decisions for that field office, rendering the plan void.
Why we flagged it
This is a procedural CRA resolution under 5 U.S.C. § 801 et seq., which allows Congress to disapprove and nullify agency rules within 60 legislative days. It does exactly one thing: reject a specific BLM resource management plan.
What the text implies
- Disapproving the plan does not automatically restore prior management rules — it creates a regulatory vacuum that may require BLM to revert to an earlier plan or issue a new one, potentially triggering additional environmental review.
- The GAO opinion (June 25, 2025) classified the RMP as a 'rule' under the CRA, which is a legal determination that may be contested; if overturned, the disapproval could be challenged as procedurally invalid.
The full analysis lists 3 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
oil and gas extraction companies (if the rejected plan restricted drilling); mining operators (if the plan restricted mineral leasing); renewable energy developers (if the plan favored wind/solar siting)