QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress orders annual audit of farm-input reliance on China

H.R. 1995 — Securing American Agriculture Act · Filed by Ashley Hinson (R-IA) · 18 cosponsors · Introduced Mar 10, 2025 · Referred to committee

65%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
28/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Supply-Chain Resilience & China-Focused…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill requires the Secretary of Agriculture to conduct annual assessments of U.S. dependency on critical agricultural inputs (equipment, fertilizers, seeds, veterinary drugs, fuel, feed, and crop chemicals) that could be vulnerable to Chinese supply-chain disruption or weaponization. The Secretary must recommend legislative and regulatory actions to reduce reliance on China and strengthen domestic production capacity. Information is collected on a voluntary basis from private entities, aggregated to protect trade secrets and individual company identity, and used only for the assessment itself.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core function is to mandate annual federal assessment of U.S. agricultural input dependencies on China and recommend policy actions to reduce that dependency. It is framed as a national-security and food-security measure, not a direct subsidy or deregulation, but it creates a regulatory framework that may impose compliance costs on agricultural suppliers and producers.

What the text implies

  • The Secretary's broad discretion to define 'critical agricultural inputs' beyond the listed categories ('any other critical agricultural inputs, as determined by Sec.') could expand regulatory scope unpredictably, affecting a wider range of agricultural suppliers and potentially increasing compliance burden.
  • Annual assessments and recommendations for 'legislative and regulatory actions' may trigger downstream regulations that are not explicitly authorized in this bill, creating a regulatory pipeline that is not transparent in the current text.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

domestic agricultural equipment manufacturers; domestic fertilizer producers; domestic seed companies

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record