QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence
Full Simple

Cancer screening alerts come to your doctor's office—automatically

H.R. 10850 — SCREENS Act · Filed by Ashley Hinson (R-IA) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Oct 19, 2026 · Referred to committee

78%
Transparency
Typical bill: 85%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Public Health Infrastructure, Cancer…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill requires the federal government to create a standardized, machine-readable framework for cancer screening recommendations that doctors' offices and health insurers can use to automatically alert patients when they are due for screening. The framework will be based on guidelines from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and National Cancer Institute, updated annually, and designed to make screening recommendations more accessible to patients. Within five years, all certified electronic health record systems must include this functionality, and health insurers will be encouraged to adopt it.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is a mandate to build and deploy a standardized, interoperable framework for cancer screening recommendations embedded in health IT systems. This is infrastructure legislation aimed at improving preventive care delivery and patient access to evidence-based guidance—a public health function, not a market intervention or private carve-out.

What the text implies

  • EHR vendors will face new certification requirements within 5 years, creating compliance costs and potential market consolidation pressure on smaller vendors unable to implement the framework.
  • Health plans' adoption of the framework is encouraged but not mandated, creating potential variation in patient access to screening alerts depending on plan choice and insurer investment decisions.
  • The framework's reliance on age, sex, and 'high-risk factors' may embed existing disparities in clinical guideline development if those guidelines themselves reflect historical underdiagnosis in certain populations.
  • Patients' ability to 'request changes' to their health information (privacy protection clause) may create administrative burden on health systems and unclear legal boundaries around patient-initiated data correction vs. clinical accuracy.

Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.

Who it affects

The bill creates infrastructure to help patients and clinicians identify and act on evidence-based cancer screening recommendations through automated, accessible technology. Patients gain clearer information about their screening status, reduced administrative friction, and support for shared decision-making—all at no direct cost to them. Privacy protections are built in, and the framework is grounded in established clinical evidence.

Who stands to gain

  • Electronic health record (EHR) vendors
  • Health information technology developers
  • Managed care organizations and health insurers (reduced administrative burden for screening tracking
  • Clinical decision support software providers

Named in the bill

National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), National Cancer Institute (NCI), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), Minimal Common Oncology Data Elements (mCODE), United States Core Data for Interoperability (USCDI), Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Electronic health record (EHR) vendors (unnamed), Medicaid managed care organizations, Medicare Advantage plans — and 1 more

Where it stands

1 cosponsor: 1 Democrats.

  • Oct 19, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
  • Oct 19, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on Ways and Means and House Committee on Energy and Commerce · Congress.gov: “Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a…”

Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.

How this was measured

Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (6,422 characters) on Oct 21, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,388 analysed bills.

Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.

As of — page rendered 2026-10-21.

“Cancer screening alerts come to your doctor's office—automatically” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr10850 Report an error

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record

The week in bills

One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.

One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.