Congress threatens to strip all federal funding from states that limit police immigration detention
H.R. 1821 — HELD Act · Filed by Ken Calvert (R-CA) · Introduced Mar 4, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill withholds all federal funding from any state or local government that has laws or policies preventing police from holding immigrants in custody for up to 48 hours based on federal immigration detainers, or from providing information about immigrants in their custody to federal immigration authorities. It allows local jurisdictions within non-compliant states to apply directly for federal funds they would normally receive through the state.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a federal funding cutoff—a conditional-spending threat—designed to force state and local compliance with federal immigration detention practices. It is not a direct regulation of immigration but a fiscal penalty imposed on jurisdictions that exercise local control over police cooperation with federal immigration authorities.
What the text implies
- The bill applies to ALL federal funding, not just law-enforcement grants—schools, transportation, healthcare, and infrastructure in non-compliant jurisdictions would lose federal support, creating collateral damage to citizens unrelated to immigration policy.
- The 'notwithstanding' clause allowing direct federal funding to local subdivisions within non-compliant states may fragment state governance and create fiscal chaos, as local governments compete for federal dollars while the state loses revenue.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
Immigration detention contractors (private prison operators, transport services); Federal law enforcement agencies (DHS, ICE) gain expanded local cooperation without additional feder