Forest Service ordered to suppress wildfires in 24 hours—with no new funding
H.R. 178 — To require the Secretary of Agriculture to carry out activities to suppress wildfires, and for other purposes. · Filed by Tom McClintock (R-CA) · 9 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 3, 2025 · Reported out
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires the U.S. Forest Service to suppress wildfires on National Forest lands within 24 hours of detection, using all available resources, with mandatory immediate suppression of any prescribed fire that exceeds its intended boundaries. The mandate applies only to forests in severe drought, extreme drought, exceptional drought, or highest-risk fire zones. The bill does not authorize new funding or resources; it mandates the use of existing resources under a strict timeline.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a direct mandate to the Forest Service to suppress wildfires within 24 hours using all available resources on high-risk National Forest lands. This is a straightforward regulatory requirement, not a subsidy, carve-out, or deregulation.
What the text implies
- The 24-hour suppression mandate may conflict with established incident command protocols and firefighter safety doctrine, which prioritize life safety over speed. Forcing suppression within 24 hours in remote, steep, or weather-challenged terrain could increase injury and fatality risk.
- The bill does not appropriate new funding, meaning it mandates action using existing Forest Service budgets. This could force reallocation away from prevention, prescribed burning, forest thinning, and infrastructure—all proven long-term wildfire risk reduction strategies.
- Prescribed burning is a critical tool for reducing catastrophic wildfire risk, but the bill's requirement to 'immediately suppress any prescribed fire that exceeds prescription' may chill the use of this tool, as any deviation triggers mandatory suppression, increasing liability and operational risk for the Forest Service.
- The definition of 'covered lands' uses three separate criteria (drought intensity, national preparedness level, fireshed risk ranking), creating potential ambiguity about which lands trigger the mandate and when, and may lead to inconsistent application across regions.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill's core mandate—faster wildfire suppression—serves a genuine public interest in protecting lives, property, and air quality. However, the 24-hour suppression requirement is operationally unrealistic in many terrain and weather conditions, may force dangerous firefighting decisions, and could divert resources from prevention and prescribed burning—proven long-term risk reduction tools. The bill also contains no appropriations, meaning it mandates action without funding, potentially strain
Named in the bill
U.S. Forest Service, Secretary of Agriculture, National Forest System, U.S. Drought Monitor, National Interagency Fire Center, State and local firefighting agencies
Where it stands
9 cosponsors: 8 Republicans, 1 Independents.
- Jan 3, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Jan 3, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Natural Resources and House Committee on Agriculture · Congress.gov: “Referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committee on Natural Resources, for a period…”
- Jul 23, 2025 — Markup held in committee · Congress.gov: “Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held”
- Jul 23, 2025 — Reported out of committee · Congress.gov: “Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
4 lobbying clients named this bill on 7 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $4,995,758 in lobbying spend. A filing names 123 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 72% of bills with at least one filing.
Tom McClintock, the sponsor, reported $165,376 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- American Property Casualty Insurance Association — $3,540,000 on 2 filings
- National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies — $1,005,758 on 2 filings
- Defenders of Wildlife — $270,000 on 1 filing
- Sierra Club — $180,000 on 2 filings
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 22, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (2,576 characters) on Jun 8, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 22, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
- H.R. 178 on Congress.gov
- Actions and status history
- Cosponsors (9)
- Bill text the analysis read
- American Property Casualty Insurance Association — LDA filing, 2026 Q2
- National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies — LDA filing, 2026 Q2
- Defenders of Wildlife — LDA filing, 2026 Q2
- Tom McClintock — FEC candidate receipts, 2026 cycle
“Forest Service ordered to suppress wildfires in 24 hours—with no new funding” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr178 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.