Congress gives free park passes to cops and firefighters—but not teachers
H.R. 183 — Law Enforcement Officer and Firefighter Recreation Pass Act · Filed by Tom McClintock (R-CA) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Jan 3, 2025 · Passed chamber
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends federal law to provide free annual National Parks passes to law enforcement officers and firefighters (federal, state, local, and tribal employees) who can prove their eligibility. Previously, only active-duty military members and their dependents received free passes; this bill adds law enforcement and firefighters to that list at no cost to them.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a straightforward expansion of an existing federal benefit program to include two specific occupational classes. It is not a broad public benefit (not all citizens qualify) but a targeted occupational perk funded by foregone federal revenue.
What the text implies
- The bill does not specify how the National Park Service will verify eligibility or manage the expanded pass distribution, potentially creating administrative burden and inconsistency across parks.
- No sunset or review provision; the benefit is permanent, and future Congresses cannot easily adjust the list of eligible professions without new legislation.
- The definition of 'firefighter' includes wildland firefighters employed by any government entity, potentially covering seasonal or contract workers whose eligibility status may be ambiguous.
- The bill creates a precedent for occupational carve-outs in federal recreation benefits; other professions (teachers, nurses, social workers, EMTs) may lobby for inclusion, fragmenting the program.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Law enforcement and firefighters receive a modest but real benefit (free annual park access, ~$80 value per person per year). However, the bill creates a narrow occupational carve-out that excludes other public servants (teachers, nurses, social workers, emergency medical technicians not employed by government) and ordinary citizens, raising fairness questions about who deserves subsidized recreation access and why these professions are singled out.
Who stands to gain
- law enforcement officers (federal, state, local, tribal)
- firefighters (federal, state, local, tribal)
Named in the bill
National Park Service, Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act, 54 U.S.C. § 805(b), Department of Interior, state and local law enforcement agencies, state and local fire departments, Indian Tribes
Where it stands
1 cosponsor: 1 Republicans.
- Jan 3, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Jan 3, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Agriculture and House Committee on Natural Resources · Congress.gov: “Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period…”
- Jun 25, 2025 — Markup held in committee · Congress.gov: “Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held”
- Jun 25, 2025 — Reported out of committee · Congress.gov: “Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by Unanimous Consent”
- Jul 21, 2025 — Passed the House · Congress.gov: “On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H3496)”
- Jul 21, 2025 — Floor vote scheduled · Congress.gov: “Mr. Stauber moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended”
- Jul 21, 2026 — Hearing held · Congress.gov: “Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on National Parks. Hearings held”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
1 lobbying clients named this bill on 2 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $100,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 64 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 0% of bills with at least one filing.
Tom McClintock, the sponsor, reported $165,376 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Peace Officers Research Association of California — $100,000 on 2 filings
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 19, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (1,401 characters) on Apr 14, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 19, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress gives free park passes to cops and firefighters—but not teachers” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr183 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.