QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

President gets sweeping power to freeze Chinese assets, revoke visas—with minimal oversight.

H.R. 1486 — Economic Espionage Prevention Act · Filed by Rich McCormick (R-GA) · 3 cosponsors · Introduced Feb 21, 2025 · Passed chamber

65%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
25/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Foreign Sanctions & Export Control…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill authorizes the President to impose sanctions—including asset freezes and visa revocations—against foreign companies and individuals (primarily Chinese entities) that engage in economic espionage, steal U.S. trade secrets, support Russia's military, or violate U.S. export controls. It requires the State Department to report within 90 days on Chinese companies supplying critical military components to Russia, and allows the President to block their property in the U.S. and bar their personnel from entering the country.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is presidential authority to impose sanctions (asset freezes, visa revocations) against foreign entities engaged in espionage, military support to Russia, or export control violations. While framed as anti-espionage, the core function is a sanctions delegation statute targeting China-Russia defense supply chains.

What the text implies

  • The bill grants the President broad discretion to designate 'foreign adversary entities' with minimal statutory guardrails—the definition of 'foreign adversary' is delegated to existing regulations (15 CFR 7.4), creating potential for expansive interpretation without new congressional input.
  • The 180-day renewable waiver mechanism allows the President to suspend sanctions indefinitely without congressional approval, effectively nullifying the statute's force through executive discretion alone.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

U.S. defense contractors and semiconductor manufacturers (reduced competition from sanctioned Chines; U.S. technology and IP-intensive firms (enhanced trade secret protection and reduced espionage risk); Insurance and compliance service providers (increased demand for sanctions screening and export cont

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record