QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

State Dept. gets warrantless drone surveillance power, bypassing wiretap law

H.R. 1386 — To establish a Department of State Domestic Protection Mission relating to unmanned aircraft system and unmanned aircraft. · Filed by Cory Mills (R-FL) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Feb 14, 2025 · Referred to committee

45%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
58/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
High concernWarrantless Drone Surveillance and Seizure…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill grants the Department of State authority to detect, track, disrupt, seize, and destroy unmanned aircraft (drones) that pose a threat to State Department facilities and personnel, without requiring a warrant or prior consent. The State Department can intercept drone communications, jam signals, and use force to disable aircraft, with oversight from the FAA and a 7-year sunset. The bill benefits State Department security operations and contractors; ordinary citizens may face surveillance of their drone communications and loss of drone property without judicial process.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core function is to grant the State Department broad power to conduct surveillance, intercept communications, and seize property related to unmanned aircraft with explicit exemptions from constitutional protections and federal wiretapping law. This is fundamentally a surveillance and seizure authority, not a routine security measure.

What the text implies

  • The bill defines 'credible threat' solely at the Secretary of State's discretion, with no external review or judicial standard, creating potential for mission creep beyond diplomatic security.
  • Warrantless interception of drone communications (including encrypted signals) overrides Title III wiretapping protections and Fourth Amendment requirements, setting a precedent for other agencies.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

drone detection and counter-UAS technology companies; defense contractors specializing in electronic warfare; private security firms with State Department contracts

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record