Congress moves to fire its own independent budget watchdog.
H.Res. 1006 — Removing the Director of the Congressional Budget Office. · Filed by Cory Mills (R-FL) · Introduced Jan 15, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This resolution removes the Director of the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) effective immediately upon adoption. The CBO is Congress's independent fiscal scorekeeper—it analyzes the cost and impact of proposed legislation. Removing its director is a direct assertion of congressional power over an agency designed to provide objective budget analysis to all members regardless of party.
Why we flagged it
The resolution asserts direct congressional control over an agency statutorily designed to be independent. It does not reform CBO processes, adjust its mandate, or address specific performance failures—it simply removes the sitting director, signaling political dominance over fiscal analysis.
What the text implies
- Removal of the CBO director without stated cause or performance review sets a precedent for politicizing independent congressional support agencies, potentially affecting the Congressional Research Service, Government Accountability Office, and other nonpartisan bodies.
- If adopted, this resolution may trigger a succession crisis: the CBO's statutory structure and the identity of an interim or replacement director become unclear, potentially leaving Congress without fiscal analysis capacity during budget deliberations.
- The resolution cites section 201(a)(4) of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974, which grants Congress removal authority—but does not state grounds. This may signal an intent to remove the director for policy disagreements rather than misconduct, eroding the norm of agency independence.
- Citizens and advocacy groups who rely on CBO scoring to evaluate legislation lose a trusted source of analysis. Legislators from both parties have historically used CBO estimates to challenge spending claims; removal of the director may signal an intent to weaken that constraint.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Citizens depend on the CBO's independent analysis to understand what legislation actually costs and who bears the burden. Removing the director without cause signals political control over the agency and undermines its credibility as a neutral arbiter. This weakens democratic accountability by removing a key check on fiscal claims made by either party.
Named in the bill
Congressional Budget Office (CBO), House Committee on the Budget, Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974, Rep. Mills (sponsor)
Where it stands
- Jan 15, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on the Budget · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on the Budget”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (759 characters) on Jul 5, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress moves to fire its own independent budget watchdog.” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hres1006 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.