QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Homeland Security to seize control of port crane operations nationwide

H.R. 1165 — Port Crane Security and Inspection Act of 2025 · Filed by Carlos Gimenez (R-FL) · 8 cosponsors · Introduced Feb 10, 2025 · Referred to committee

65%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
25/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Port Infrastructure Security Mandate

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill requires the Department of Homeland Security to inspect newly constructed foreign-made cranes at U.S. ports for cybersecurity risks before they operate, and to assess existing foreign cranes within 180 days. It prohibits new contracts for foreign cranes from being operated at U.S. ports and requires all foreign cranes to stop using foreign software within 5 years. The bill targets cranes with components or software manufactured by entities controlled by countries the U.S. intelligence community identifies as foreign adversaries (primarily China).

Why we flagged it

The bill's core function is to impose cybersecurity inspection and operational restrictions on foreign-manufactured cranes at U.S. ports. While framed as security, it functions as a de facto procurement restriction targeting specific foreign suppliers, with secondary effects on port operations and logistics costs.

What the text implies

  • The 5-year timeline for removing foreign software may force ports to replace or retrofit cranes ahead of their operational lifespan, creating stranded assets and capital expenditure spikes.
  • Broad definition of 'foreign crane' (any component from a covered-country entity) may capture cranes with only minor foreign subcomponents, potentially affecting more equipment than intended.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

U.S. crane manufacturers and suppliers (domestic equipment replacement demand); Cybersecurity consulting and inspection firms; Port operators (if they can pass costs to shippers)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record