Grocery stores banned from charging you more based on your face or data
H.R. 10905 — No Personal Data in Grocery Pricing Act · Filed by Eugene Vindman (D-VA) · Introduced Oct 22, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill prohibits large grocery stores (15,000+ sq ft) from using individualized pricing, dynamic pricing, or facial recognition to set prices. It allows limited exceptions: coupons, loyalty discounts, age/disability/veteran/student discounts, markdowns for perishable items, delivery fees, and price differences between store locations. The FTC and state attorneys general enforce the ban as unfair trade practices.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a straightforward ban on algorithmic and personalized pricing practices at large grocery retailers, with narrow carve-outs for transparent, non-discriminatory discounts. It is a consumer-protection measure, not a subsidy, tax provision, or commemorative act.
What the text implies
- Retailers may respond by reducing loyalty-program benefits or shifting to flat-rate delivery fees, potentially raising baseline prices for all consumers to offset lost personalization revenue.
- The 15,000 sq ft threshold exempts small grocers and convenience stores, creating a two-tier market where smaller competitors face no restrictions and may adopt aggressive personalized pricing.
- FTC enforcement depends on detecting evasion; retailers may obscure personalized pricing through opaque algorithmic routing, bundling, or third-party intermediaries, requiring sophisticated monitoring.
- The bill does not restrict price discrimination based on location, time-of-day, or inventory levels if not tied to consumer personal data, leaving dynamic pricing loopholes for surge pricing during peak hours.
- State attorneys general gain enforcement authority, creating potential for inconsistent enforcement and forum-shopping by retailers across state lines.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Ordinary consumers gain protection against algorithmic price discrimination that exploits personal data, purchase history, and demographic characteristics. The bill preserves legitimate discounts (loyalty programs, age-based, perishable markdowns) while blocking opaque personalized surcharges, reducing hidden costs and information asymmetry at the grocery checkout.
Named in the bill
Federal Trade Commission (FTC), State attorneys general, Large retail food stores (15,000+ sq ft), Covered operators, Consumers
Where it stands
- Oct 22, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Oct 22, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on Energy and Commerce · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (10,872 characters) on Oct 28, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,595 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-10-28.
“Grocery stores banned from charging you more based on your face or data” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr10905 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.