SuperPACs must name their top funders on every political ad
H.R. 10566 — Sunlight on SuperPACs Act of 2026 · Filed by Marcy Kaptur (D-OH) · 7 cosponsors · Introduced Sep 24, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires SuperPACs and independent expenditure committees spending $10,000 or more per year to disclose the top three funders of each campaign advertisement they run, showing names and amounts contributed. The disclosure must appear on the ad itself and cover any donor who gave $5,000 or more to the SuperPAC in the prior 12 months. The goal is to let voters know who is actually funding the political ads they see before they vote.
Why we flagged it
The bill's sole operative mechanism is a disclosure requirement—it mandates that SuperPACs reveal their top funders on campaign advertisements. It does not restrict spending, ban contributions, or regulate speech; it only requires transparency about funding sources.
What the text implies
- Disclosure requirement applies only to SuperPACs spending $10,000+ annually; smaller independent committees remain unaffected, potentially creating incentive to fragment spending across multiple entities to avoid threshold.
- Top Three Funders list requirement may incentivize SuperPACs to accept larger donations from fewer sources rather than many small donations, concentrating funding visibility but potentially increasing donor concentration.
- When a SuperPAC receives funds from another political committee, the bill requires disclosure of that committee's top two funders, creating a two-step disclosure chain that may be difficult for voters to parse in real time.
- Effective date of January 1, 2027 gives SuperPACs and committees approximately 3 months to implement systems for tracking and disclosing top funders on each communication, potentially creating compliance challenges.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Voters gain actionable information about who is funding political advertisements before they vote, enabling more informed electoral decisions. The bill imposes a transparency obligation on SuperPACs without restricting their speech or spending, only requiring disclosure of funding sources.
Named in the bill
SuperPACs, independent expenditure committees, Federal Election Commission, Citizens United v. FEC, SpeechNow.org v. FEC, Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, Section 318, Section 304(f)(3)
Where it stands
7 cosponsors: 7 Democrats.
- Sep 24, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Sep 24, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on House Administration · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on House Administration”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (5,113 characters) on Sep 28, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.
“SuperPACs must name their top funders on every political ad” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr10566 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.