Colleges must now report all foreign funding—and get federal permission to work with hostile nations
H.R. 1048 — Defending Education Transparency and Ending Rogue Regimes Engaging in Nefarious Transactions Act · Filed by Michael Baumgartner (R-WA) · 21 cosponsors · Introduced Feb 6, 2025 · Passed chamber
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires U.S. colleges and universities to disclose all foreign gifts and contracts above certain thresholds ($50,000 for most foreign sources, any amount from designated hostile countries) to the Department of Education, which will publish them in a searchable public database. It also prohibits institutions from entering contracts with designated foreign countries of concern or entities unless they obtain a one-year waiver from the Secretary of Education, and requires faculty and staff at large research institutions to disclose their own foreign gifts and contracts. Institutions that fail to comply face civil enforcement, fines up to 200% of investment values, and loss of waiver eligibility.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is mandatory disclosure of foreign gifts/contracts to a federal database plus a prohibition on contracts with designated hostile nations (waiverable by the Secretary). It is fundamentally a transparency and national-security-gating measure, not a subsidy, deregulation, or commemorative act.
What the text implies
- The bill grants the Secretary of Education broad discretion to issue or deny one-year waivers for contracts with foreign countries of concern, with only vague standards ('benefit to mission and students' and 'promote security, stability, and economic vitality'). This creates a potential political chokepoint for international research partnerships and may chill legitimate academic collaboration.
- Faculty and staff disclosure requirements (Section 117B) apply to institutions receiving >$50M in federal R&D funds or any Title VI funds, capturing most major research universities. The requirement to disclose contracts as low as $5,000 and gifts above 'minimal value' (defined in federal ethics law as ~$390) creates a high-volume reporting burden and privacy exposure for individual researchers.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
Compliance software vendors and consulting firms (new market for institutional reporting systems); Law firms specializing in higher-education and export-control compliance; Database and IT service providers (building and maintaining federal disclosure portal)