Congress locks in tourism access for Guam, requiring DHS to consult before suspending any country.
H.R. 10341 — Marianas Tourism Advancement Act of 2026 · Filed by Kimberlyn King-Hinds (R-MP) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Sep 10, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends the visa waiver program for Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands to add six countries (India, Philippines, Vietnam, Thailand, Indonesia, and Mongolia) to the eligible list, while simultaneously imposing new procedural requirements on the Department of Homeland Security before it can suspend any country from the program. The bill requires DHS to consult with multiple agencies and territorial governors, conduct an economic impact assessment, and notify Congress 60 days in advance before suspending any country—except in genuine emergencies. Citizens and businesses in Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands benefit from expanded tourism and visitor access; the procedural safeguards protect against arbitrary suspension decisions that could harm local economies.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is twofold: it expands the visa waiver program to six new countries (a tourism/economic development measure) while simultaneously constraining DHS suspension authority through mandatory consultation, assessment, and Congressional notice. The procedural layer is not a rider—it is integral to the bill's stated purpose of advancing tourism while protecting territorial interests.
What the text implies
- The bill's requirement that DHS consult with the Secretaries of Interior, State, and Commerce—plus both territorial governors—before suspension creates a high procedural bar that may make suspension politically difficult even when security or immigration concerns arise, potentially locking in visa waiver status regardless of changed conditions.
- The mandatory economic impact assessment may privilege economic considerations over security or immigration enforcement concerns, creating a structural bias toward maintaining the program even if public safety metrics deteriorate.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
tourism operators in Guam and Northern Mariana Islands; hospitality and accommodation businesses in the territories; airlines serving Guam and CNMI