Pacific territories gain mining revenue share, but environmental study comes after leases issued
H.R. 10318 — PACMESA · Filed by Kimberlyn King-Hinds (R-MP) · Introduced Sep 8, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends federal law to allow seabed mining in waters near U.S. Pacific territories (Guam, American Samoa, Northern Mariana Islands) and requires that 50% of mining revenues be shared with those territories for coastal restoration, infrastructure, and environmental mitigation. Miners must post security bonds and cannot receive royalty relief; the federal government retains 50% of revenues.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is not a blanket authorization but a conditional one: it amends OCSLA to permit seabed mining in specified Pacific waters while imposing financial safeguards (surety bonds, no royalty relief) and mandating revenue sharing with adjacent territories. The core function is to create a revenue-distribution model, not simply to deregulate mining.
What the text implies
- Environmental study (Section 2(a)(4)) is completed AFTER leases may be issued, not before—study findings are advisory and do not block mining authorization.
- Revenue allocation formula is set by Secretary regulation, not statute—territories have no direct control over how their share is calculated or adjusted.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
seabed mining companies (reduced regulatory burden, access to new lease areas); Pacific territories (direct revenue sharing, estimated at 50% of mining revenues)