U.S. courts blocked from enforcing foreign censorship judgments
H.R. 10174 — GRANITE Act · Filed by Michael Rulli (R-OH) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Aug 27, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill prohibits U.S. courts from recognizing or enforcing foreign court judgments that are based on foreign censorship laws—laws that restrict speech, target expression by content or viewpoint, or compel disclosure in ways that would violate the First Amendment if applied in the U.S. It gives U.S. persons sued under such foreign judgments the right to sue in federal court for a declaration that the foreign judgment is unenforceable, and it removes sovereign immunity as a defense for foreign states pursuing such judgments.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a straightforward prohibition on U.S. court enforcement of foreign censorship judgments and a removal of sovereign immunity for foreign states pursuing such judgments. It is a defensive measure protecting U.S. persons' speech rights from foreign state coercion.
What the text implies
- Foreign states may respond by refusing to enforce U.S. judgments in their courts, creating reciprocal enforcement barriers.
- The definition of 'foreign censorship law' turns on whether it would conflict with the First Amendment—this may create litigation over comparative constitutional law and the scope of First Amendment protections.
- The bill does not address enforcement of foreign judgments against U.S. corporations or entities operating abroad; it protects 'U.S. persons,' which may exclude some business entities depending on statutory definition.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
U.S. citizens and persons gain a concrete legal shield against foreign censorship judgments being enforced against them domestically, and a federal forum to challenge such judgments. This protects First Amendment-equivalent speech rights from foreign state coercion and prevents foreign censorship regimes from using U.S. courts as enforcement mechanisms.
Named in the bill
U.S. District Courts, Foreign states, U.S. persons, Chapter 181, Title 28 U.S.C., Section 1603 (Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act), First Amendment
Where it stands
1 cosponsor: 1 Republicans.
- Aug 27, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Aug 27, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on the Judiciary · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (2,249 characters) on Sep 7, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,398 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-10-23.
“U.S. courts blocked from enforcing foreign censorship judgments” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr10174 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.