QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence
Full Simple

New AI tax funds federal job-creation program with union protections

H.R. 10044 — AI Tax and Work Protection Act · Filed by Gregorio Casar (D-TX) · 4 cosponsors · Introduced Aug 6, 2026 · Referred to committee

78%
Transparency
Typical bill: 85%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
AI Tax and Job Creation Program

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill creates a new federal tax on AI transactions (defined under section 4491 of the Internal Revenue Code), establishes a trust fund from 100% of those tax revenues, and uses that fund to create a new 'Work Protection Administration' within the Department of Labor. The administration awards competitive grants to states, local governments, schools, nonprofits, and other eligible entities to hire workers for public-interest jobs—child care, education, health care, infrastructure, environmental work, and journalism—at prevailing wages with union protections and full benefits. The bill also funds labor-market research on AI's impact on workers.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is a new federal excise tax on AI transactions, with 100% of revenues dedicated to a competitive grant program for public-sector job creation. The title accurately describes the function: a tax on AI paired with worker protections and job creation.

What the text implies

  • The bill does not define 'covered transactions' or the tax rate in the provided text—section 4491 is referenced but not included, leaving the actual tax mechanism and scope opaque. Implementation details (what counts as an AI transaction, how tokens are valued) are delegated to the Secretary of the Treasury, creating regulatory uncertainty.
  • The trust fund is established as a permanent, annually replenished mechanism tied to AI tax revenue, making the job-creation program's scale dependent on AI transaction volume and the Secretary's regulatory definitions. If the tax is narrowly defined or easily avoided, the fund may be smaller than anticipated.
  • The bill requires eligible entities to recognize union representation if 50% of grant-funded employees vote for it, but does not mandate unionization—this creates a soft union-organizing incentive that may face legal or political challenge.
  • The advisory committee includes governors and union representatives but explicitly exempts itself from the Federal Advisory Committee Act, reducing transparency and public access to committee deliberations and recommendations.
  • The bill authorizes $20 million annually for BLS labor-market research on AI impacts (2027–2031) but does not mandate that findings inform future policy, creating a data-collection mandate without enforcement of use.

Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.

Who it affects

Ordinary citizens gain direct access to well-paying, benefits-rich public-sector jobs funded by a new tax on AI transactions; workers hired under the program receive prevailing wages, health insurance, paid leave, and union organizing rights. The bill explicitly protects existing workers from displacement and prioritizes permanent, full-time employment. The civic cost—a new tax on AI—is transparent and tied to a clear public return (job creation and labor-market research), not a subsidy or carve

Who stands to gain

  • State and local governments (grant recipients)
  • Nonprofits and educational institutions (eligible grant recipients)
  • Workers hired under the program (wages, benefits, union organizing rights)
  • Labor unions (organizing opportunity and advisory role)

Named in the bill

Department of Labor, Work Protection Administration (WPA), Department of Commerce, Federal Reserve, National Labor Relations Board, Bureau of Labor Statistics, National Science Foundation, Council of Economic Advisors, Office of Science and Technology Policy, Internal Revenue Service, Treasury Department, State governments — and 5 more

Where it stands

4 cosponsors: 4 Democrats.

  • Aug 6, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
  • Aug 6, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on Ways and Means and House Committee on Education and Workforce · Congress.gov: “Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for…”

Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.

How this was measured

Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (19,006 characters) on Aug 7, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.

Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.

As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.

“New AI tax funds federal job-creation program with union protections” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr10044 Report an error

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record

The week in bills

One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.

One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.