H.R. 10575, Copyright Enforcement Mechanism with Collateral Access Risk. Quorum's AI analysis reads it as a trade-off: gains for some, costs for others.
H.R. 10575 · Mixed
What it does
This bill creates a new legal mechanism allowing copyright owners to petition federal courts to designate foreign websites as 'piracy sites' and then order U.S. broadband providers and major DNS services to block access to them. Copyright holders benefit by gaining a faster, court-backed tool to restrict access to infringing content hosted abroad; broadband providers and DNS operators bear the compliance cost and legal liability risk, though they receive immunity for good-faith blocking efforts.
The analysis names copyright holders and entertainment companies — and 2 more groups — among the beneficiaries.
The trade-off
Service providers receive broad immunity even when blocking non-infringing sites or interfering with legitimate access, shifting liability risk to users and legitimate operators who cannot easily challenge the blocking.
The analysis put a high warning level on this bill. Transparency scores 72%, and the analysis found no provisions unrelated to the bill's subject.
Who is behind it
Filed by Zoe Lofgren. Cosponsored by Ben Cline.
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.