Senate declares renewable energy cheapest—but resolution has no teeth
S.Res. 565 — A resolution recognizing that facilities that produce renewable electricity are the cheapest power-generating facilities to operate and reliance on fossil fuel-generating facilities to meet growing power demand drives up wholesale electricity prices. · Filed by Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) · 8 cosponsors · Introduced Dec 17, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This is a Senate resolution stating that renewable energy facilities (wind, solar) have near-zero operating costs and are the cheapest to run, while fossil fuel plants (coal, gas, oil) have high fuel and maintenance costs. The resolution argues that as electricity demand grows, utilities must turn to more expensive fossil plants, which drives up wholesale electricity prices for consumers.
Why we flagged it
This is a non-binding Senate resolution that makes a factual assertion about renewable versus fossil fuel generation costs and their effect on electricity prices. It has no legislative mechanism, appropriations, or enforcement power—it is purely a statement of Senate position.
What the text implies
- As a messaging resolution with no binding force, this serves primarily to establish a Senate-level position that may influence future energy legislation, regulatory arguments, or public debate—but does not directly mandate any policy change.
- The resolution's framing that renewable energy is 'cheapest to operate' may be used to support arguments for renewable subsidies, carbon pricing, or fossil fuel restrictions in future bills, even though this resolution itself does not enact such measures.
Who stands to gain
renewable energy companies and developers; solar and wind equipment manufacturers; utilities with renewable portfolios