QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress moves to block California's stricter vehicle pollution rules

S.J.Res. 45 — A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "California State Motor Vehicle and Engine Pollution Control Standards; Advanced Clean Cars II; Waiver of Preemption; Notice of Decision". · Filed by Shelley Capito (R-WV) · 31 cosponsors · Introduced Apr 4, 2025 · Referred to committee

95%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
5/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Environmental Deregulation via CRA

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This resolution uses the Congressional Review Act to block an EPA decision that allowed California to set its own vehicle pollution standards stricter than federal rules. The rule, finalized in January 2025, granted California a waiver to enforce Advanced Clean Cars II standards (requiring more zero-emission vehicles). If passed, the resolution would nullify that waiver, preventing California from enforcing stricter pollution controls and reverting to federal standards.

Why we flagged it

This is a straightforward Congressional Review Act disapproval resolution targeting an EPA environmental rule. It uses the CRA's expedited process to block a regulatory action without amendment or debate, effectively deregulating vehicle pollution standards by restoring federal preemption over state authority.

What the text implies

  • If passed, this resolution would trigger the CRA's 'same rule' prohibition, preventing EPA from issuing a substantially similar rule without new congressional authorization—effectively locking in federal preemption for vehicle pollution standards.
  • The resolution targets only the waiver decision, not the underlying Advanced Clean Cars II rule itself, meaning the federal standard remains in place but California cannot exceed it.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

automotive manufacturers; fossil fuel producers; oil and gas refineries

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record