Congress blocks EPA rule that delayed PFAS reporting.
S.J.Res. 187 — A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "Modification to the Start of the Submission Period for Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Reporting and Recordkeeping Under TSCA 8(a)(7)". · Filed by Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) · Introduced Apr 27, 2026 · Reported out
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This resolution disapproves an EPA rule. The rule pushed back when companies must report PFAS use. If passed, the rule is canceled. The earlier reporting deadline goes back into place. Companies must disclose PFAS use on the faster schedule.
Who it affects
Chemical makers and processors must report PFAS sooner. The EPA and public get faster access to data. Citizens and regulators see PFAS information on a quicker timeline.
One thing to notice
This resolution only changes when companies must report PFAS. It does not ban PFAS, limit use, or require cleanup.
From the analysis of the bill text, linked under Primary records below.
Where it stands
- Apr 27, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
- Apr 27, 2026 — Referred to Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works”
- Jul 28, 2026 — Reported out of committee · Congress.gov: “Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c)”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
1 groups reported lobbying about this bill. They filed 1 reports from Jun 2026 to Jun 2026.
Those reports show $630,000 in lobbying spending. Each report lists about 59 bills. So that money was not all for this bill.
More groups named this bill than 0% of bills with any report.
Sheldon Whitehouse, who sponsored the bill, received $52,000 from PACs for the 2026 election.
- American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees — $630,000 in 1 report
Lobbying is legal. These reports show who lobbied about this bill, not what changed.
Words to know
- PFAS — Forever chemicals that break down very slowly in the environment and bodies.
- EPA — Environmental Protection Agency. The federal agency that protects air, water, and land.
- disapproves — Rejects or cancels an official rule so it no longer has legal power.
- reporting — Telling the government about something, like which chemicals a company uses.
- lobbying — Trying to influence lawmakers about a bill. Companies and groups pay people to do this.
- PACs — Groups that collect money and give it to candidates for office.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (1,642 characters) on Aug 20, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 14,206 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-09-17.
“Congress blocks EPA rule that delayed PFAS reporting.” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/sjres187/simple Report an error