QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress moves to block CFPB's retreat on FDIC-fraud protections

S.J.Res. 175 — A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Consumer Financial Protection Circular 2022-02: Deceptive Representations Involving the FDIC's Name or Logo or Deposit Insurance". · Filed by Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) · Introduced Apr 13, 2026 · Referred to committee

95%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
5/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Consumer Protection Restoration

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This resolution blocks the CFPB's 2025 decision to withdraw a 2022 consumer-protection rule that banned deceptive use of the FDIC's name or logo in marketing. By disapproving the withdrawal, Congress restores the anti-deception rule, preventing financial institutions from misleading consumers about FDIC insurance coverage.

Why we flagged it

This is a Congressional Review Act disapproval resolution that restores a withdrawn consumer-protection rule. Its sole function is to block a regulatory rescission and reinstate anti-deception standards for FDIC-related marketing claims.

What the text implies

  • Restoring the rule may increase compliance costs for smaller financial institutions and fintech firms that rely on FDIC insurance marketing; however, the cost is borne by institutions, not consumers.
  • The resolution signals congressional intent to preserve CFPB authority to issue consumer-protection circulars and resist executive-branch rescissions of such guidance.

The full analysis lists 3 implications of this text.

Who it affects

Ordinary consumers are protected from deceptive marketing that falsely implies FDIC insurance coverage or misuses the FDIC's name/logo. Restoring this rule prevents financial institutions from exploiting consumer confusion about deposit protection, reducing fraud risk and maintaining clear disclosure standards.

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record