QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress moves to restore debt-collection protections withdrawn by CFPB

S.J.Res. 162 — A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Bulletin 2015-07 re: in-person collection of consumer debt". · Filed by John Hickenlooper (D-CO) · Introduced Apr 13, 2026 · Referred to committee

85%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Consumer Protection Restoration

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This resolution disapproves a CFPB rule that withdrew consumer-debt collection protections from 2015. By voiding the withdrawal, the resolution restores those protections—meaning debt collectors must again comply with the original 2015 bulletin's limits on in-person collection tactics. Consumers regain safeguards against aggressive collection practices.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is a Congressional Review Act disapproval that restores withdrawn consumer protections. It is a procedural instrument aimed at reversing a regulatory retreat, not a substantive policy innovation.

What the text implies

  • Restoring Bulletin 2015-07 may increase compliance costs for debt-collection agencies and third-party collectors, potentially raising collection-service fees or reducing collection volume.
  • The resolution does not address whether the CFPB's original 2015 bulletin itself remains valid or whether it requires re-promulgation; implementation may depend on CFPB action.

The full analysis lists 3 implications of this text.

Who it affects

Restoring the 2015 bulletin reinstates consumer protections against aggressive in-person debt-collection practices, directly benefiting consumers facing collection activity. The bill constrains debt collectors' conduct, not citizens' rights.

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record