QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Federal funding for court-ordered firearm removal in crisis situations

S. 889 — Extreme Risk Protection Order Expansion Act of 2025 · Filed by Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) · 17 cosponsors · Introduced Mar 6, 2025 · Referred to committee

82%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
8/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Public Safety & Suicide Prevention

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill creates a federal grant program to help states and tribes establish or expand 'extreme risk protection order' (ERPO) laws—court processes that temporarily remove firearms from individuals deemed by a judge to pose a danger to themselves or others. The bill funds law enforcement training, court infrastructure, and public awareness campaigns, and amends federal law to make ERPOs a federal disqualification for firearm possession, with full faith and credit enforcement across state lines.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is a grant program funding state/tribal ERPO laws and federal integration of those orders into background-check systems. The primary civic purpose is reducing firearm-related suicide and violence through court-ordered temporary removal, not restricting gun rights broadly.

What the text implies

  • ERPO orders become a permanent federal disqualification for firearm possession under 18 U.S.C. § 922, even after state/tribal order expires, unless explicitly restored by court—this creates a lasting federal record and may complicate restoration in some jurisdictions.
  • States and tribes must report ERPO data to FBI's National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) within 30 days; incomplete or delayed reporting by state agencies could create gaps in enforcement, leaving some individuals undetected in background checks.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

State and local law enforcement agencies (training, personnel, equipment funding); State and tribal courts (infrastructure, personnel, data systems); Community-based organizations (subgrants for public awareness and training)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record