QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress moves to ban predatory lending tactics and protect consumer financial data

S. 780 — SAFE Lending Act of 2025 · Filed by Jeff Merkley (D-OR) · 11 cosponsors · Introduced Feb 27, 2025 · Referred to committee

72%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
25/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Consumer Protection & Predatory Lending…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

The SAFE Lending Act tightens rules on small-dollar loans (up to $5,000) by requiring lenders to register with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, banning remotely created checks without explicit written consumer consent, prohibiting overdraft fees on prepaid accounts, and blocking lead-generation companies from selling consumers' sensitive financial data to lenders unless they are directly providing the credit themselves. The bill aims to prevent fraud and predatory practices in high-cost lending while giving consumers more control over their bank accounts and payment methods.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core function is to regulate small-dollar lending, restrict unauthorized payment methods, and prevent the sale of consumer financial data to lenders. It is fundamentally a consumer-protection and fraud-prevention measure, not a tax or appropriations bill.

What the text implies

  • Registration requirement may create a compliance burden that consolidates the small-dollar lending market toward larger, better-resourced lenders, potentially reducing access for consumers in underserved areas if smaller lenders exit the market.
  • Lead-gen restrictions may disrupt the business model of online lending platforms and aggregators, potentially raising borrowing costs if lenders must acquire customers through more expensive direct-marketing channels.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

Consumers (reduced fees, fraud protection, data privacy); Larger, well-capitalized lenders (compliance advantage over smaller competitors); Community development financial institutions (potential market share gain if predatory lenders exit)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record