Congress demands transparency on telecom outages during disasters
S. 725 — Enhancing First Response Act · Filed by Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) · 12 cosponsors · Introduced Feb 25, 2025 · Passed chamber
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires the FCC to hold annual public hearings and issue reports after the Disaster Information Reporting System is activated for 7+ days, documenting network outages and recovery efforts. It directs the FCC to study whether telecom providers should include visual outage information in 911 center notifications and whether current outage-reporting thresholds miss critical incidents. It also requires the Office of Management and Budget to reclassify 911 dispatchers as 'protective service' workers for statistical purposes, and directs the FCC to report on enforcement of Kari's Law (which requires multi-line phone systems to allow direct 911 dialing).
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is transparency and reporting—mandating FCC public hearings, disaster reports, and outage studies to improve 911 system reliability and telecom provider accountability. It is not a subsidy, deregulation, or private carve-out; it is a public-interest information and oversight measure.
What the text implies
- The bill's 'Rule of Construction' (Section 2.3) explicitly limits FCC authority over broadband providers to only what is 'specifically authorized' in this Act—a potential constraint on future FCC rulemaking authority over broadband outages beyond the study mandated here.
- The FCC's report on visual outage information (Section 2.2) may create pressure on telecom providers to implement new notification systems, potentially increasing operational costs that could be passed to consumers or 911 agencies.
- Reclassifying 911 dispatchers as 'protective service' workers may affect federal workforce statistics, grant eligibility, or occupational safety standards, though the bill itself does not authorize spending or regulatory changes tied to this reclassification.
- The bill requires the FCC to publish disaster reports while protecting 'company-specific information' from disclosure—balancing transparency with competitive confidentiality, but potentially limiting public visibility into individual provider performance.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill strengthens transparency and accountability in telecom network reliability during disasters, ensures 911 dispatchers receive formal occupational recognition, and improves enforcement of existing 911 access rules—all without imposing new costs on citizens or restricting their rights. The public hearing and reporting requirements create accountability mechanisms for telecom providers' disaster response.
Named in the bill
Federal Communications Commission (FCC), Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Disaster Information Reporting System, Public Safety Answering Points (PSAPs), Telecom providers (broadband, VoIP, mobile), 911 dispatchers, State/local/tribal governments, Emergency management agencies
Where it stands
12 cosponsors: 6 Republicans, 5 Democrats, 1 Independents.
- Feb 25, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
- Feb 25, 2025 — Referred to Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation”
- Apr 30, 2025 — Reported out of committee · Congress.gov: “Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of…”
- Sep 10, 2025 — Passed the Senate · Congress.gov: “Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S6555; text of amendment in the…”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
2 lobbying clients named this bill on 4 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $6,340,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 42 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 41% of bills with at least one filing.
Amy Klobuchar, the sponsor, reported $116,500 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Charter Communications Inc — $5,020,000 on 2 filings
- American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees — $1,320,000 on 2 filings
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (8,126 characters) on Jun 8, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress demands transparency on telecom outages during disasters” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s725 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.