Patent law shift tilts scales toward inventors, away from competition
S. 708 — RESTORE Patent Rights Act of 2025 · Filed by Christopher Coons (D-DE) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Feb 25, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends patent law to create a legal presumption that courts should grant permanent injunctions (court orders stopping infringement) when a patent owner wins an infringement case, unless the defendant can rebut that presumption with equitable defenses. The bill reverses a recent shift in judicial practice and aims to restore what Congress characterizes as the historical default: that winning a patent case entitles the owner to an injunction stopping the infringing conduct, rather than leaving it to the court's discretion.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a procedural change to patent infringement remedies—shifting the burden of proof in injunction decisions. It is not a substantive patent-rights expansion but a litigation-process reform that favors patent holders in court proceedings.
What the text implies
- Injunctions can block entire product lines, not just infringing components, giving patent holders leverage to extract high licensing fees or settlements from larger companies that cannot afford to redesign products.
- The presumption may disproportionately benefit patent-holding entities (including non-practicing entities / 'patent trolls') that do not manufacture products themselves but hold patents primarily to litigate, as they face no countervailing injunction risk.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
individual inventors and patent holders; small and medium-sized enterprises holding patents; universities and research institutions with patent portfolios