New federal law expands liability for abortion providers with treble damages
S. 6 — Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act · Filed by James Lankford (R-OK) · 50 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 15, 2025
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill creates a federal crime for health care practitioners who fail to provide the same level of medical care to infants born alive during or after an abortion as they would to any other newborn, and requires immediate hospital admission. It imposes criminal penalties (up to 5 years imprisonment), mandatory reporting by medical staff, and creates a civil right of action for the woman to sue for damages including treble damages and punitive damages. The mother herself cannot be prosecuted.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is to impose criminal and civil liability on health care practitioners for failure to provide standard care to born-alive infants. While framed as a protection measure, its primary functional effect is to expand legal exposure and create new causes of action against abortion providers and clinics.
What the text implies
- Treble damages and punitive damages provisions may create financial incentives for litigation that exceed actual harm, potentially chilling abortion provision even in cases where practitioners comply with the duty of care.
- Mandatory reporting requirement applies to all hospital and clinic employees, not just practitioners, creating broad surveillance and reporting obligations that may extend beyond the bill's stated purpose.
- The bill's definition of 'born alive' references 1 U.S.C. § 8, which defines it as any infant with a heartbeat, pulse, or voluntary muscle movement—a definition that may capture infants with severe anomalies incompatible with life, creating tension with palliative care practices.
- Civil remedy structure allows the woman to recover damages from 'any person who committed the violation,' potentially exposing hospital administrators, nurses, and other staff to personal liability.
- Interaction with state abortion bans and restrictions creates legal uncertainty: practitioners in states with near-total bans may face conflicting duties if a born-alive situation arises.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill creates a legal duty to provide standard medical care to born-alive infants, which protects vulnerable newborns and aligns with existing medical ethics. However, the civil remedy structure—treble damages, punitive damages, and mandatory attorney fees—creates significant financial exposure for practitioners and may chill provision of abortion services or create defensive medicine practices that increase costs or delay care. The bill's interaction with state abortion laws and its enforcem
Who stands to gain
- plaintiff's attorneys (mandatory fee awards in successful civil actions)
- medical malpractice insurers (increased claims volume)
Named in the bill
health care practitioners, abortion providers, hospitals, physician offices, abortion clinics, state and federal law enforcement, 18 U.S.C. Chapter 74, 1 U.S.C. § 8 (Born-Alive Infants Protection Act)
Where it stands
50 cosponsors: 50 Republicans.
- Jan 15, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
6 lobbying clients named this bill on 8 disclosure filings across 3 quarters, Mar 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $5,657,329 in lobbying spend. A filing names 46 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 82% of bills with at least one filing.
James Lankford, the sponsor, reported $368,500 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Southern Company — $3,220,000 on 1 filing
- American Academy of Family Physicians — $1,715,904 on 2 filings
- American Psychiatric Association — $391,974 on 1 filing
- Service Employees International Union Ctw-clc — $286,000 on 1 filing
- Power to Decide — $33,451 on 2 filings
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (5,332 characters) on Sep 7, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,398 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Mar 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-23.
“New federal law expands liability for abortion providers with treble damages” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s6 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.