Congress restricts data centers on public lands, exempts tribal territory
S. 5658 — A bill to prohibit the construction of data centers on Federal land, and for other purposes. · Filed by Ron Wyden (D-OR) · Introduced Sep 30, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill prohibits the construction of data centers on federal land managed by the Forest Service or Interior Department, with an exception for tribal lands. It also requires that any federal land sold or transferred after enactment must include a clause allowing the government to reclaim the land if it is later used for a data center, unless Congress explicitly authorizes such use.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a straightforward prohibition on private data center construction on federal property, coupled with a reversionary clause for future land conveyances. This is a land-use policy measure, not a subsidy, tax provision, or commemorative act.
What the text implies
- May reduce federal government's ability to generate revenue through land leases or sales to data center operators, potentially affecting Interior and Forest Service budgets.
- Reversionary clause requirement may discourage private investment in land adjacent to or near federal property if future data center use is uncertain.
- Exemption for tribal lands may create a two-tier system where tribal nations can authorize data centers on their territory while non-tribal federal land cannot, potentially shifting development to tribal lands.
- Could indirectly increase pressure to develop data centers on private land, potentially accelerating conversion of private agricultural or natural lands to commercial use.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Citizens benefit from preservation of federal lands for conservation, recreation, and public use rather than private commercial development. However, data center development can provide jobs, tax revenue, and infrastructure investment; restricting it may increase energy costs or reduce broadband investment in some regions. The balance depends on whether federal land preservation or data center expansion better serves the public interest.
Named in the bill
U.S. Forest Service, Department of the Interior, Indian Tribes, Data center operators (restricted parties)
Where it stands
- Sep 30, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
- Sep 30, 2026 — Referred to Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (2,383 characters) on Oct 13, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress restricts data centers on public lands, exempts tribal territory” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s5658 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.