QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress approves $1B water settlement for four New Mexico Pueblos

S. 562 — Rio San José and Rio Jemez Water Settlements Act of 2025 · Filed by Martin Heinrich (D-NM) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Feb 13, 2025 · Reported out

65%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Indian Water Rights Settlement

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill approves and funds two separate water rights settlements for four New Mexico Pueblos: Acoma and Laguna (Rio San José system) and Jemez and Zia (Rio Jemez system). The federal government will deposit approximately $1.05 billion into trust funds for these Pueblos to acquire water rights, build water infrastructure, and conduct feasibility studies. In exchange, the Pueblos waive most historical water rights claims against the federal government and other parties, though they retain claims for environmental violations and future water rights.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core function is to ratify and fund two negotiated water rights settlements between the federal government, four Pueblos, the State of New Mexico, and other water users. It is a settlement authorization and appropriations measure, not a deregulation, tax provision, or commemorative act.

What the text implies

  • The bill conditions the entire settlement on the Secretary of Interior publishing a statement of findings by July 1, 2030 (or later by agreement). If this deadline is missed, all waivers expire, appropriated funds must be returned, and the settlement collapses—creating significant execution risk.
  • Pueblos waive claims for 'foregone benefits from non-Pueblo use of water' and 'failure to provide' water infrastructure, which may preclude future claims for historical federal mismanagement of water resources, even if new evidence emerges.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

Pueblo of Acoma; Pueblo of Laguna; Pueblo of Jemez

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record