QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Federal grants to fight beetle-killed forests, protect water and communities

S. 5290 — Emergency Mountain Pine Beetle Response and Coordination Act · Filed by Michael Bennet (D-CO) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Aug 6, 2026 · Referred to committee

82%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Public Lands Forest Health Program

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill establishes a competitive grant program through the U.S. Department of Agriculture to fund forest restoration projects on National Forest System lands affected by mountain pine beetle outbreaks. Eligible sponsors—states, local governments, Indian tribes, water districts, and utilities—can apply for grants to remove dead trees, reduce wildfire fuel, restore forests, and protect watersheds and critical infrastructure. The bill also authorizes USDA to enter into cooperative agreements with state and local governments to coordinate beetle detection, treatment, and mitigation efforts, and provides technical assistance for workforce development and wood processing.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is a competitive grant and cooperative agreement program to address mountain pine beetle damage on federal and state forest lands. It is a straightforward environmental and public-safety response measure with no hidden commercial carve-outs or private subsidies.

What the text implies

  • Wood processing and workforce development provisions may indirectly benefit timber and wood-products industries through market creation for beetle-kill byproducts, though the bill frames this as economic development tied to restoration, not a subsidy.
  • Cooperative agreements with electric utilities and transmission organizations may create pathways for utility cost-recovery or infrastructure hardening funded partly by federal grants, though the bill does not explicitly authorize cost-sharing or reimbursement mechanisms.

The full analysis lists 3 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

state and local governments; Indian tribes; water management and conservation districts

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record