QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress requires political committees to disclose paid influencer posts

S. 5136 — Promoting Authenticity with Influencer Disclaimers Act · Filed by Adam Schiff (D-CA) · Introduced Jul 27, 2026 · Referred to committee

85%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
5/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Campaign Finance Transparency

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill requires political committees to clearly disclose when they pay influencers, content creators, or other people to post political messages on social media and digital platforms. The disclosure must be visible, audible, or readable depending on the format (video, audio, text, or graphics). Political committees must notify the person being paid about this requirement at the time of payment. The rule takes effect January 1, 2027, and does not apply to a committee's own website or to posts by committee employees on their personal social media (unless posting is their main job).

Why we flagged it

The bill's sole operative mechanism is a disclosure requirement for paid political content on digital platforms. It amends the Federal Election Campaign Act to extend existing disclaimer rules into the influencer economy, with no hidden provisions or unrelated riders.

What the text implies

  • The bill does not specify enforcement mechanisms or penalties for non-compliance, leaving the FEC to define consequences through regulation—creating potential gaps if the agency lacks resources or political will.
  • The exception for 'compensated employees' posting on personal social media may create a loophole if committees classify influencers as contractors or temporary staff rather than employees.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who it affects

Ordinary citizens gain transparency about who is funding political messaging they encounter online, reducing deception and enabling informed judgment about political speech. The bill does not restrict speech itself—only requires disclosure of its funding source, a core accountability measure that strengthens democratic participation.

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record