New transmission lines: who pays? FERC gets vague rules to decide.
S. 5074 — Enhancing Electric Grid Resilience Act · Filed by Peter Welch (D-VT) · Introduced Jul 22, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends federal power law to allow companies building large interstate or offshore transmission lines (1,000+ megawatts, or expansions adding 500+ megawatts) to file tariffs with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) that allocate construction costs to customers in the regions that benefit from the line. The bill requires cost allocation to be 'roughly commensurate' with estimated benefits and to account for reliability, economic, public policy, resilience, and environmental factors. It does not change FERC's authority over smaller transmission projects.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to establish a regulatory mechanism for how large transmission projects allocate their costs across regions and customers. It is not a subsidy, mandate, or prohibition—it is a procedural rule for tariff filing and cost apportionment under federal power law.
What the text implies
- The 'roughly commensurate' standard is subjective and may allow utilities to allocate costs to regions with less political power or lower regulatory scrutiny, shifting burden away from wealthier or more organized customer bases.
- The bill does not require public hearings, cost-benefit analysis disclosure, or ratepayer consent before tariffs are filed, potentially enabling cost allocation decisions to proceed without transparent deliberation.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
transmission developers and operators; utilities with transmission assets; large-scale renewable energy developers (who benefit from transmission expansion)