VA pilots dual-care coordination for seniors in Medicare and VA system
S. 506 — Coordinating Care for Senior Veterans and Wounded Warriors Act · Filed by Jerry Moran (R-KS) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Feb 11, 2025 · Reported out
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill directs the VA to run a three-year pilot program in 3–5 Veterans Integrated Service Networks to coordinate care and benefits for veterans enrolled in both Medicare and the VA system. The VA will assign case managers to help these 'dual-enrolled' veterans navigate both systems, reduce gaps and duplication, and lower costs. The VA is encouraged to contract with private healthcare companies to design and manage the program, and must report quarterly to Congress on progress.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a time-limited, evidence-based pilot program to improve care coordination for a specific veteran population (dual-enrolled in Medicare and VA). It is not a permanent entitlement, appropriation, or deregulation—it is a structured demonstration project with mandatory reporting.
What the text implies
- Private sector contracting language ('to the greatest extent practicable') may create pathway for commercial health plans to embed themselves in VA care delivery; if successful, pilot could normalize outsourcing of VA care coordination to for-profit entities.
- Dual-enrolled veterans represent a growing cohort (Medicare-age + service-connected disability); success of this pilot could justify expansion to broader VA population, potentially shifting VA from direct-care provider to care-coordinator role.
- Quarterly reporting requirement creates transparency but also political pressure; if pilot shows cost savings, Congress may fast-track permanent expansion without full evaluation of long-term outcomes or veteran satisfaction.
- Case manager assignment is individualized but pilot is limited to 3–5 networks; veterans outside pilot sites remain uncoordinated, potentially creating two-tier access and raising equity questions about who benefits.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Dual-enrolled seniors (Medicare + VA) face fragmented care across two systems; this pilot assigns dedicated case managers to coordinate care, reduce duplication, and improve access—direct benefits to participating veterans. The program is time-limited, evidence-based, and requires congressional oversight through quarterly reporting.
Who stands to gain
- commercial health care programs (if contracted for care coordination)
- private sector entities providing care coordination services
Named in the bill
Department of Veterans Affairs, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Center for Innovation for Care and Payment (VA), Veterans Integrated Service Networks, Medicare program (HHS), Veterans Community Care Program, Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs, House Committee on Veterans' Affairs
Where it stands
1 cosponsor: 1 Independents.
- Feb 11, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
- Feb 11, 2025 — Referred to Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs”
- May 21, 2025 — Hearing held · Congress.gov: “Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held”
- Jul 30, 2025 — Reported out of committee · Congress.gov: “Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute…”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
3 lobbying clients named this bill on 3 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $110,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 18 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 61% of bills with at least one filing.
Jerry Moran, the sponsor, reported $396,550 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida Inc — $80,000 on 1 filing
- Guidewell Mutual Holding Corporation — $20,000 on 1 filing
- Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas Inc — $10,000 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (7,263 characters) on Jul 10, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“VA pilots dual-care coordination for seniors in Medicare and VA system” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s506 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.