Congress mandates data sharing to break Big Tech search monopoly
S. 5007 — SEARCH Act of 2026 · Filed by Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Jul 15, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill prohibits large search and advertising platforms (those with 40%+ of U.S. monthly active users) from favoring their own search engines, blocking competitors' access to data, making exclusive deals, or pre-installing their search as default. It requires these platforms to share search indexes, user data, and ad data with smaller competitors at marginal cost, license search results to rivals, and present users with neutral choice screens for selecting search engines. Violations can result in civil penalties up to 15% of annual U.S. revenue.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is structural antitrust enforcement—prohibiting exclusionary conduct, mandating data/content sharing, and requiring user choice—rather than a tax, subsidy, or commemorative measure. It is functionally a detailed regulatory statute targeting digital platform monopolies.
What the text implies
- Data-sharing obligations may create privacy risks if de-identification standards (Section 5) prove insufficient; competitors receiving user-side data could re-identify individuals despite contractual restrictions, especially when combined with external datasets.
- The 10-year sunset clause (Section 15) creates regulatory uncertainty; platforms may challenge compliance investments if Congress does not renew, and competitors may face sudden loss of data access rights.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
smaller search engine competitors (e.g., DuckDuckGo, Ecosia, Brave Search); emerging AI search startups; alternative ad networks and search ad platforms