Congress restores investor right to sue instead of forced arbitration
S. 4937 — Investor Choice Act of 2026 · Filed by Jeff Merkley (D-OR) · 5 cosponsors · Introduced Jun 24, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill prohibits brokers, dealers, investment advisers, and public companies from forcing investors into mandatory arbitration or class-action waivers. It allows investors to choose whether to arbitrate disputes or sue in court, and bars companies from listing securities or registering with the SEC if they mandate arbitration in shareholder agreements. Retail investors and shareholders gain the right to pursue legal remedies in open court rather than being locked into private arbitration.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is restoring investor choice and court access by prohibiting mandatory pre-dispute arbitration clauses across securities law. It is fundamentally a consumer-protection and access-to-justice measure, not a deregulation or industry carve-out.
What the text implies
- Brokers and advisers may respond by raising fees or tightening service terms for retail clients, since litigation risk is no longer contractually capped by arbitration.
- Class-action litigation against financial firms may increase substantially, potentially creating settlement pressure and higher compliance costs that could be passed to consumers.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
plaintiff's bar / securities litigation firms; class-action attorneys; retail investors (as a class)