QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress moves to lock EPA out of vehicle and power plant rules

S. 4931 — End EPA Abuse Act of 2026 · Filed by Mike Lee (R-UT) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Jun 24, 2026 · Referred to committee

65%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
55/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
High concernEnvironmental Deregulation / EPA Authority…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill amends the Clean Air Act to block the EPA from issuing regulations that restrict vehicle sales (including internal combustion engines), require fuel-switching at power plants, reduce electric grid reliability, mandate commercially unavailable or cost-prohibitive technology, or expand EPA authority beyond congressional intent. It does not repeal existing EPA rules but prevents future ones meeting these criteria.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is a categorical prohibition on EPA rulemaking in three high-impact domains (vehicle emissions, power plant fuel-switching, grid reliability). Despite the title's framing as 'abuse' prevention, the bill functions as a preemptive deregulation measure that strips the EPA of discretion in areas where Congress has already granted it authority under the Clean Air Act.

What the text implies

  • The prohibition on regulations that 'can reasonably be determined' to restrict vehicle sales or require fuel-switching is prospective and categorical — it does not merely delay or require cost-benefit analysis, but forecloses entire regulatory pathways regardless of future technological or economic change.
  • The 'cost-prohibitive or unachievable independent of any subsidies' language may block regulations that rely on federal tax credits, rebates, or infrastructure investment to become economically viable — effectively requiring regulations to be cost-neutral to the regulated entity without public support.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

automotive manufacturers (internal combustion engine producers); fossil fuel power generators; oil and gas refineries

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record