Congress moves to lock EPA out of vehicle and power plant rules
S. 4931 — End EPA Abuse Act of 2026 · Filed by Mike Lee (R-UT) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Jun 24, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends the Clean Air Act to block the EPA from issuing regulations that restrict vehicle sales (including internal combustion engines), require fuel-switching at power plants, reduce electric grid reliability, mandate commercially unavailable or cost-prohibitive technology, or expand EPA authority beyond congressional intent. It does not repeal existing EPA rules but prevents future ones meeting these criteria.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a categorical prohibition on EPA rulemaking in three high-impact domains (vehicle emissions, power plant fuel-switching, grid reliability). Despite the title's framing as 'abuse' prevention, the bill functions as a preemptive deregulation measure that strips the EPA of discretion in areas where Congress has already granted it authority under the Clean Air Act.
What the text implies
- The prohibition on regulations that 'can reasonably be determined' to restrict vehicle sales or require fuel-switching is prospective and categorical — it does not merely delay or require cost-benefit analysis, but forecloses entire regulatory pathways regardless of future technological or economic change.
- The 'cost-prohibitive or unachievable independent of any subsidies' language may block regulations that rely on federal tax credits, rebates, or infrastructure investment to become economically viable — effectively requiring regulations to be cost-neutral to the regulated entity without public support.
- The 'reduce the reliability of the electric grid' criterion is undefined and subjective; it grants regulated entities a veto over grid-related emissions rules by claiming reliability concerns, with no requirement for technical substantiation.
- The bill does not repeal existing EPA rules but freezes future rulemaking authority, creating a regulatory floor below which the EPA cannot go — this may insulate current rules from challenge while preventing adaptation to new evidence or technology.
- The 'otherwise significantly expand the authority of the Administrator beyond the intent of Congress' catch-all is a delegation of interpretive power to the regulated industry and courts, not a clear statutory limit.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Citizens lose the ability to benefit from future EPA regulations addressing air quality, climate, and grid reliability in these sectors. The bill's broad prohibitions on regulations addressing vehicle emissions, power plant fuel-switching, and grid impacts prevent the EPA from using its statutory authority to protect public health and environmental quality, even when technology becomes feasible or cost-effective.
Who stands to gain
- automotive manufacturers (internal combustion engine producers)
- fossil fuel power generators
- oil and gas refineries
- coal-fired power plants
Named in the bill
EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), Clean Air Act, Administrator (EPA), 40 CFR 63.9375 (internal combustion engine definition), Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works
Where it stands
1 cosponsor: 1 Republicans.
- Jun 24, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
- Jun 24, 2026 — Referred to Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
1 lobbying clients named this bill on 1 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $140,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 40 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 0% of bills with at least one filing.
Mike Lee, the sponsor, reported $241,000 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Heritage Action for America — $140,000 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 16, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (1,984 characters) on Aug 12, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 16, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress moves to lock EPA out of vehicle and power plant rules” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s4931 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.