QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress funds local food networks to reduce supply-chain fragility

S. 4842 — American Food Supply Chain Resiliency Act · Filed by Adam Schiff (D-CA) · 3 cosponsors · Introduced Jun 18, 2026 · Referred to committee

82%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
8/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Agricultural Infrastructure & Market Access

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill creates two federal grant programs to strengthen local and regional food supply chains. The first program provides up to $200 million annually (2027–2031) to states, which then award grants of $100,000–$3 million to farms, processors, food hubs, and nonprofits to build infrastructure for aggregating, processing, storing, and distributing locally grown food. The second program funds at least 10 regional food systems hubs (plus one tribal hub) with $75 million annually to provide business coaching, financial assistance, and help connecting local producers to schools, hospitals, and retailers. Both programs prioritize underserved farmers (beginning, veteran, and socially disadvantaged producers) and aim to reduce dependence on distant supply chains.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core function is to fund infrastructure and technical assistance for local and regional food systems, with explicit equity priorities for underserved producers. It is a straightforward public investment in supply-chain resilience and rural economic development.

What the text implies

  • The $200M annual appropriation for state-administered grants may create administrative burden and inconsistency across states, potentially disadvantaging producers in states with weaker agricultural departments or less competitive grant processes.
  • The 20% cap on supply-chain coordination spending and 8% administrative cost limit may constrain states' ability to invest in data systems, workforce training, or long-term market development that could amplify the program's impact.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

small and mid-sized farms; agricultural processors and food hubs; nonprofit food organizations

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record