QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress funds semiconductor training—but only where chips are already booming

S. 4810 — CHIPS Training in America Act of 2026 · Filed by Mark Kelly (D-AZ) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Jun 17, 2026 · Referred to committee

55%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Workforce Development Grant Program

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill creates a federal grant program to fund workforce training and education in semiconductor manufacturing and related fields. It authorizes up to $7 million per grant (50% federal cost-share) to partnerships of community colleges, vocational schools, and industry partners to develop training programs, and requires the National Semiconductor Technology Center to develop a 5-year national strategy coordinating federal workforce efforts across Labor, Education, and Veterans Affairs.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is a competitive grant program for semiconductor workforce training, funded through existing CHIPS Act appropriations. It is a straightforward education and training authorization with no hidden provisions or narrow carve-outs.

What the text implies

  • The bill redirects existing CHIPS Act appropriations (originally intended for manufacturing incentives and research) toward workforce training, potentially reducing funds available for direct manufacturing subsidies or R&D grants.
  • By requiring partnerships to include 'covered entities' (industry), the bill creates a mechanism for semiconductor manufacturers to shape curriculum and training priorities, potentially aligning education with employer needs but also concentrating influence over workforce development.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

Community colleges and vocational institutions (grant recipients); Semiconductor manufacturers and equipment suppliers (industry partners in eligible partnerships, sha; Workforce development organizations and state/local boards (coordination and administration)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record