FERC gains power to fast-track giant power consumers' grid access
S. 4806 — POWER Up Act · Filed by Cynthia Lummis (R-WY) · Introduced Jun 17, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill clarifies that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has jurisdiction over how large electricity consumers (those needing 100+ megawatts of power) connect directly to the interstate transmission grid. It requires FERC to establish standardized interconnection procedures within 18 months and preserves state authority over local siting, permitting, retail rates, and generation.
Why we flagged it
The bill is a narrow jurisdictional amendment that clarifies FERC's authority over a specific class of electricity consumers (large loads ≥100 MW) seeking direct transmission connections. It is not deregulation or a broad market reform—it is a procedural clarification with a rulemaking mandate.
What the text implies
- Standardized interconnection procedures may accelerate data center, AI facility, and large manufacturing plant connections to the grid, potentially favoring capital-intensive industries that can afford direct transmission access over smaller consumers.
- FERC's authority to adjust the 100 MW threshold 'by rule' creates regulatory flexibility that could expand or contract the scope of large load facilities without further congressional action.
- Clarification of FERC jurisdiction may reduce litigation over interconnection disputes, lowering transaction costs for large consumers but potentially reducing leverage for state and local governments in negotiations.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Ordinary citizens may benefit from clearer rules that could lower electricity costs for large consumers (which may reduce prices downstream) and improve grid reliability, but the bill primarily serves large industrial and commercial users who can negotiate direct transmission access—a narrow beneficiary class. State and local governments retain siting authority, limiting any negative local impact.
Who stands to gain
- large industrial and commercial electricity consumers (data centers, semiconductor manufacturers, AI
- transmission operators and utilities (reduced jurisdictional ambiguity, standardized procedures)
- energy-intensive industries seeking direct grid access
Named in the bill
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), Federal Power Act Section 201, Section 205 (Federal Power Act), Section 206 (Federal Power Act), Section 215(a) (bulk-power system definition), large load facilities (≥100 MW), interstate transmission grid, state and local governments
Where it stands
- Jun 17, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
- Jun 17, 2026 — Referred to Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (2,710 characters) on Sep 26, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.
“FERC gains power to fast-track giant power consumers' grid access” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s4806 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.