Congress orders urgent study of farm-tech cybersecurity gaps
S. 4794 — Precision Agriculture Cybersecurity Act · Filed by Tim Sheehy (R-MT) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Jun 16, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill directs the Departments of Agriculture and Homeland Security to study cybersecurity threats to farm technology systems—sensors, software, and data tools used in modern farming—and report back within one year on gaps in U.S. defenses, particularly against attacks from China, North Korea, Russia, and Iran. It also asks the Government Accountability Office to assess how well federal agencies coordinate on this issue. No new funding, regulations, or mandates are created; it is purely a fact-finding exercise.
Why we flagged it
The bill's sole function is to mandate two government studies—one by USDA/DHS and one by the GAO—on cybersecurity threats to precision agriculture and federal coordination gaps. It is a fact-finding and transparency measure, not a regulatory or appropriations instrument.
What the text implies
- The bill's focus on 'foreign countries of concern' (China, North Korea, Russia, Iran) may signal future regulatory or procurement restrictions on precision agriculture technology from those nations, though no such mandate is stated here.
- Public disclosure of cybersecurity gaps in agricultural systems could inadvertently reveal vulnerabilities to malicious actors, though the bill allows classified annexes to Congress to mitigate this risk.
- The study may recommend new federal funding or staffing for agricultural cybersecurity, which could lead to future appropriations or regulatory action not yet proposed.
Who it affects
Ordinary farmers and rural communities depend on precision agriculture systems for food production and economic viability. Understanding cybersecurity vulnerabilities in these systems—and identifying coordination gaps in federal defense—serves the public interest by reducing the risk of agricultural disruption from foreign cyberattacks. The bill creates no new burdens on citizens and produces public information.
Who stands to gain
- cybersecurity software and hardware vendors (AMD, HPE, Cisco, Verisign)
- precision agriculture technology providers
- federal contractors specializing in agricultural infrastructure security
Named in the bill
Department of Agriculture (USDA), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), Government Accountability Office (GAO), Food and Agriculture Sector Coordinating Council, Food and Agriculture-Information Sharing and Analysis Center, People's Republic of China, Russian Federation, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Islamic Republic of Iran, AMD, HPE — and 3 more
Where it stands
1 cosponsor: 1 Democrats.
- Jun 16, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
- Jun 16, 2026 — Referred to Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the full bill text on Jul 9, 2026; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress orders urgent study of farm-tech cybersecurity gaps” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s4794 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.