Congress orders urgent study of farm-tech cybersecurity gaps
S. 4794 — Precision Agriculture Cybersecurity Act · Filed by Tim Sheehy (R-MT) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Jun 16, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill directs the Departments of Agriculture and Homeland Security to study cybersecurity threats to farm technology systems—sensors, software, and data tools used in modern farming—and report back within one year on gaps in U.S. defenses, particularly against attacks from China, North Korea, Russia, and Iran. It also asks the Government Accountability Office to assess how well federal agencies coordinate on this issue. No new funding, regulations, or mandates are created; it is purely a fact-finding exercise.
Why we flagged it
The bill's sole function is to mandate two government studies—one by USDA/DHS and one by the GAO—on cybersecurity threats to precision agriculture and federal coordination gaps. It is a fact-finding and transparency measure, not a regulatory or appropriations instrument.
What the text implies
- The bill's focus on 'foreign countries of concern' (China, North Korea, Russia, Iran) may signal future regulatory or procurement restrictions on precision agriculture technology from those nations, though no such mandate is stated here.
- Public disclosure of cybersecurity gaps in agricultural systems could inadvertently reveal vulnerabilities to malicious actors, though the bill allows classified annexes to Congress to mitigate this risk.
The full analysis lists 3 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
cybersecurity software and hardware vendors (AMD, HPE, Cisco, Verisign); precision agriculture technology providers; federal contractors specializing in agricultural infrastructure security