New federal agency to police $1.3T in foreign investment commitments—with broad power to block deals
S. 4748 — Foreign Investment Review Monitoring and Commitment Tracking Oversight Board Act · Filed by Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) · Introduced Jun 11, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill creates a new federal agency called the Foreign Investment Review Authority (FIRA) to track and evaluate whether foreign countries fulfill investment commitments they have made to the United States. FIRA will determine which investments count toward those commitments, require investors to disclose details about their deals, and can block or suspend investments that don't meet standards for job quality, domestic benefit, and ethics compliance. The bill retroactively designates specific investment commitments from China, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan totaling over $1.3 trillion.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to establish a new regulatory body that monitors and enforces foreign investment commitments to the U.S., with authority to block investments that fail to meet job-quality and economic-benefit standards. It is primarily a governance and transparency mechanism, not a subsidy or carve-out.
What the text implies
- Retroactive designation of $1.3+ trillion in commitments from four countries (China, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan) with no prior formal agreement or public record—creates immediate compliance pressure on those nations and potential trade friction if they dispute the amounts or dates.
- FIRA's 'net economic benefit' standard is subjective and multi-factor (domestic growth, job quality, union neutrality, domestic sourcing); investors face attestation liability and 10% penalties for misstatement, creating chilling effect on foreign investment even if standards are met.
- Senior U.S. officials (President, VP, Cabinet) must disclose if they or family members benefit from any covered investment; disclosure triggers ethics review but does not bar the investment, creating potential conflicts of interest in FIRA determinations.
- FIRA can suspend or prohibit investments unilaterally; investors can appeal only to FIRA (requiring 6-vote supermajority to overturn) or federal court, but court review is limited to factual error or procedural violation—gives FIRA substantial discretionary power.
- Bill requires quarterly updates from investors until investment is complete, creating ongoing compliance burden and real-time disclosure of proprietary deal information to a federal agency and Public Oversight Board.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Citizens gain transparency into foreign investment flows and protections requiring job quality standards (higher wages, benefits, union neutrality), which is a concrete public benefit. However, the bill retroactively imposes $1.3+ trillion in investment commitments on foreign governments without clear enforcement mechanism if they fail to meet them, and FIRA's broad discretion to block investments may reduce capital inflows and job creation if applied too restrictively. The net effect depends he
Named in the bill
Foreign Investment Review Authority (FIRA), Chief Ethics Officer, Public Oversight Board, People's Republic of China, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Secretary of Commerce, Attorney General, Secretary of Labor — and 2 more
Where it stands
- Jun 11, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
- Jun 11, 2026 — Referred to Senate Committee on Finance · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
1 lobbying clients named this bill on 1 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $230,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 24 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 0% of bills with at least one filing.
Tammy Baldwin, the sponsor, reported $195,336 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- United Automobile Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers — $230,000 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (24,422 characters) on Sep 27, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“New federal agency to police $1.3T in foreign investment commitments—with broad power to block deals” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s4748 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.