QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress adds warrant requirement to warrantless surveillance—but keeps bulk collection alive

S. 4738 — A bill to implement reforms relating to foreign intelligence surveillance authorities, protections relating to warrantless queries for the communications of United States persons, and for other purposes. · Filed by Ron Wyden (D-OR) · Introduced Jun 10, 2026 · Referred to committee

62%
Transparency
Typical bill: 85%
25/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
1
Unrelated riders
No connection to the stated subject
Surveillance Warrant Requirement Reform

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill amends the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) to restrict warrantless searches of Americans' communications and data collected under Section 702 surveillance. It requires federal agents to obtain a warrant or meet narrow exceptions (emergency, consent, cybersecurity defense) before accessing information about U.S. persons in existing foreign intelligence databases. It also extends Section 702 authority for nine months and mandates detailed record-keeping of all queries and access attempts.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core function is to impose warrant and judicial-review requirements on warrantless queries of Americans' data in foreign intelligence databases—a civil liberties constraint on executive surveillance power, not a deregulation or carve-out.

  • Nine-month extension of Section 702 authority (to March 12, 2027) is substantively unrelated to the warrant-requirement reforms and appears to be a separate legislative vehicle bundled for passage.

What the text implies

  • The bill does not eliminate Section 702 bulk collection itself—it only restricts how agents can search and access data already collected. The underlying surveillance authority remains intact and continues to operate without individual warrants.
  • Emergency exceptions allow warrantless access for imminent threats of death/serious bodily harm, with only 7-day post-hoc FISA Court review. If the Court later denies the emergency, evidence is excluded but the access already occurred—a gap in real-time protection.
  • The 'significant foreign intelligence purpose' standard for queries is undefined and may be interpreted broadly by agencies, potentially allowing searches that nominally target foreign intelligence but incidentally capture Americans' data.
  • Query record-keeping requirements depend on agency compliance and FISA Court oversight, but enforcement mechanisms and penalties for violations are not specified in the text.
  • The bill extends Section 702 for nine months without substantive reauthorization debate, deferring a full legislative reckoning on bulk surveillance authority.

Who it affects

Ordinary Americans gain meaningful protection against warrantless surveillance of their communications and data. The bill requires judicial oversight (FISA Court review) and congressional notification for emergency access, and mandates transparency through detailed query records. These are direct civil liberties gains for the general public.

Named in the bill

Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), Section 702, FISA Amendments Act of 2008, Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Attorney General, Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, House Committee on the Judiciary, Senate Committee on the Judiciary

Where it stands

  • Jun 10, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
  • Jun 10, 2026 — Referred to Senate Select Committee on Intelligence · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Select Committee on Intelligence”

Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.

How this was measured

Analysis — Quorum's AI read the full bill text on Jul 9, 2026; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.

Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.

As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.

“Congress adds warrant requirement to warrantless surveillance—but keeps bulk collection alive” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s4738 Report an error

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record

The week in bills

One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.

One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.