Pentagon must prove AI doesn't break soldier skills
S. 4683 — WARP Act of 2026 · Filed by Mark Kelly (D-AZ) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Jun 4, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires the Secretary of Defense to study how artificial intelligence systems affect soldiers' ability to maintain critical combat skills and stay operationally ready. The DoD must identify which military jobs are most at risk of skill loss when AI takes over tasks, test whether soldiers can still perform without AI, and recommend changes to training and doctrine to keep warfighters combat-capable even when AI systems fail or are unavailable.
Why we flagged it
The bill is fundamentally a mandate for the DoD to conduct and report on research into AI's effects on warfighter capability and skill retention. It is a governance and accountability measure, not a procurement, appropriation, or technology deployment bill.
What the text implies
- The bill's emphasis on 'hard-to-recover skills' and 'degraded-mode operations' signals concern that AI systems may create single points of failure in military operations; if AI infrastructure is compromised or unavailable, soldiers may lack the independent judgment and manual skills to operate effectively.
- Requiring assessment of 'overreliance, miscalibrated confidence in system outputs, diminished trust in independent human judgment' suggests the bill anticipates that AI adoption could erode soldier decision-making autonomy and situational awareness—a human-factors risk that may not be obvious to policymakers focused on capability gains.
- The three-year longitudinal study timeline and emphasis on 'recovery trajectories' imply that skill atrophy from AI use may be significant and slow to reverse, potentially creating long-term readiness vulnerabilities if training protocols are not updated.
- The bill's coordination requirement across Army Research Institute, Office of Naval Research, Air Force Research Laboratory, and the Chief Digital and AI Office suggests fragmentation in how AI is being integrated across the military; the assessment may reveal inconsistent or uncoordinated AI deployment practices.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill mandates accountability and transparency around a significant military technology shift by requiring rigorous assessment of whether AI adoption degrades warfighter readiness and human judgment. Citizens benefit from oversight ensuring that military effectiveness and soldier safety are not compromised by over-reliance on AI systems, and from public reporting of findings to Congress.
Who stands to gain
- defense research contractors
- military research institutes
- AI and simulation software vendors
- academic research institutions and federally funded research and development centers
Named in the bill
Secretary of Defense, Department of Defense, Army Research Institute for Behavioral and Social Sciences, Office of Naval Research, Air Force Research Laboratory Human Effectiveness Directorate, Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Office, Congressional defense committees, John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019
Where it stands
1 cosponsor: 1 Republicans.
- Jun 4, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
- Jun 4, 2026 — Referred to Senate Committee on Armed Services · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
1 lobbying clients named this bill on 1 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $10,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 14 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 0% of bills with at least one filing.
Mark Kelly, the sponsor, reported $48,750 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- The Alliance for Secure Ai Action — $10,000 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (9,604 characters) on Aug 17, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Pentagon must prove AI doesn't break soldier skills” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s4683 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.