Tax break for consumers winning lawsuits against lenders, debt collectors
S. 467 — End Double Taxation of Successful Consumer Claims Act · Filed by Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV) · 6 cosponsors · Introduced Feb 6, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill allows consumers who win settlements or judgments in consumer protection lawsuits to deduct their attorney fees and court costs from their taxable income as an 'above-the-line' deduction. Currently, these fees are often taxable income to the consumer even though they go directly to the lawyer, creating a 'double taxation' effect where the consumer pays income tax on money they never actually receive. The bill covers lawsuits involving lending, credit reporting, debt collection, product safety, and other consumer protection violations.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a targeted tax deduction for a specific class of taxpayers (consumers winning protection claims). It is functionally a tax relief measure, not a substantive consumer protection expansion.
What the text implies
- The deduction applies retroactively to any judgment or settlement in the current tax year, potentially creating a large one-time revenue loss if many past settlements are claimed.
- By making consumer litigation more economically attractive (higher net recovery), the bill may increase the volume of consumer lawsuits, which could affect litigation costs and settlement patterns across industries.
- The definition of 'consumer protection violation' is extremely broad and includes any federal, state, or local law regulating consumer transactions, potentially capturing claims beyond traditional consumer protection statutes.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Ordinary consumers who win consumer protection lawsuits are better off because they keep more of their settlement money instead of paying income tax on attorney fees they never received. This removes a hidden tax penalty on successful consumer claims and makes it economically easier for people to pursue legitimate consumer protection cases.
Who stands to gain
- consumers winning settlements or judgments
- consumer protection attorneys (indirectly, by making cases more economically viable)
Named in the bill
Internal Revenue Code Section 62, Federal Trade Commission, Truth in Lending Act, Fair Credit Reporting Act, Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, Consumer Product Safety Act, Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, Servicemembers Civil Relief Act
Where it stands
6 cosponsors: 6 Democrats.
- Feb 6, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
- Feb 6, 2025 — Referred to Senate Committee on Finance · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
1 lobbying clients named this bill on 2 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $3,610,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 120 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 0% of bills with at least one filing.
Catherine Cortez Masto, the sponsor, reported $298,634 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- American Association for Justice — $3,610,000 on 2 filings
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (2,190 characters) on Jul 25, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Tax break for consumers winning lawsuits against lenders, debt collectors” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s467 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.